Running PBO with +200mhz, scaler at x10, rest auto and just the positive offset. My single core score in cinebench went up after it and I see single core boost at 4400-4500+ depending on load. MB Asus x570 - e and RAM 3600 8x4. Congrats, you've got clock stretching. Let me tempt you with some stuff I just now did with my 3900x and Prime95 SmallFFTs as a proxy for a DC workload (yes, some DC workloads can actually be worse). So, if you have a processor like the Ryzen 9 3900X with a maximum boost clock of 4.6GHz, no core will ever go beyond that value. Turn AMD Cool n Quiet from Auto to Enabled. I was only monitoring cpufreq of cpu0 so you dont get to see the max pbo across all cores but that gets too messy to view when you're viewing 24 cores. Adaptive Mode will change the voltage depending on whether it’s idle or under load. I managed to overclock my 3900X to 4.3GHz across all cores – a big improvement from the 3.9GHz I achieved out of the box, but still a little short of AMDs claimed 4.6GHz. After undervolting I boot into my system, work/game for a couple of days and after that I fire OCCT 4.5.1 (10min, 0 idle periods, 64bits, large date set, 16 threads) for 10 minutes. Always used to OC my chips but having a play here it doesnt seem to have much point in even messing with OC as results arent much to talk about for the effort. Snow. I seen this alone with the crazy low voltages they report. We also ran Blender and logged frequency, but the Cinebench numbers are plenty for now. I haven't build it yet. Last edited by ZER0_K%; Apr 24 @ 4:25pm < > Showing 1-15 of 19 comments . Overclocking-Guru Roman "der8auer" Hartung (sprich: "der Bauer") hat sich in Zusammenarbeit mit dem für den Sockel AM4 vorgeknöpft und deren freien Multiplikator genutzt, um die schon regulär sehr hohe Taktfrequenz von 3,8 GHz noch weiter anzuheben. Most of the time those programs won't even pick up a - voltage offset. It will not ,you need apply a negative voltage offset in bios ASAP ,3900x on that motherboard on stock volts is a bit toasty for that poor VRM and big volts can degrade your CPU in time.I have basically same VRM on my 2700x and with PBO I had to offset -0.1v . The reddit post was itself a response to a video where a YouTuber claimed to be lowering temperatures and boosting performance on Ryzen 3000 CPUs by lowering the vcore value in BIOS; we never did catch the video, as it has since been retracted and followed-up by the creator and community with new information. The offset value is added or subtracted from the Additional Turbo Mode CPU Core Voltage box, and the total is displayed in the Total Adaptive Mode CPU Core Voltage pane. In my case and with my specific MOBO (Asus C6H - x370) the different Ryzen CPUs I had (3600x, 3700x and now 3900x) behaved in the same way: - High voltage at idle up to 1.5V - (Thus) 'high' idle temps: around 37-45ºC Produktinformationen - der8auer Ryzen 9 3900X 3,8 GHz (Matisse) pretested @ 4,30 GHz Sorgenfrei übertakten für das Extra an Gaming-Power! He is looking at you saying "leave me auto dude, or if you wish give me some negative offset and leave me alone". 130W resulted in max boost clocks of about 3.9-4.0MHz instead of the 4.1-4.2 that I got on stock settings. Beiträge 28. These idle spikes are nothing to do with cooling, I got them with my H110i, and I've now got 3 x 360mm custom loop and I still get it, it's to do with the IHS not transferring the heat quick enough, so it lingers a bit and I see the temp rise from 30 to 50ish in a flash, but the heat isn't transferred into the water as it's not there long enough nor hot enough as it's only pulling ~50W during a spike. These charts show VID instead. I have a 3900x with the stock cooler and a gigabyte x570 UD motherboard. I haven't played with the voltage offset yet, but I did try adjusting the PPT from 142W to other levels. Limit your EDC to 140 as well. My personal strongest results are -0.075 or -0.08125 on CPU and leaving the SoC as-is. Hello ! Voltage offset is your friend. We used a +0.4v VCCSA offset to get the memory that high and a 1.5v DRAM voltage. R9-3900X | GA-X570 Aorus Xtreme | 32GB 3600MHz CL17 | GTX 1070 | Samsung 970 Evo Plus Sabaj D3 | Superlux HD668B. 0 Kudos Share. I think i might have seen the temps jump to like 72°C while playing but it is a small 3 sec at most spike from mid to high 60's . Remember that when the A-Phase voltage is zero, the other two phases will not be at zero, so different phases will react to the same fault differently. It's a bit weird to dial in though. August 15, 2020. Edit: specs Ryzen 3900x Cooler master 212 evo Aorus ultra 1.x mobo Aorus 2080 super waterforce Corsair 32g (16x2) 3200MHz 1TB samsung evo nvme m.2 4 nzxt case fans+ the rad and 2 fans from GPU. ... AMD specifies 3200MHz as memory clock on the Ryzen 9 3900X. For me the offset was the best thing I have done to boost performance and reduce temps. Keep doing increasing the offset and running the tests until your score decreases. It didn’t on the 3600, but the 3900X was a different story. It may be voltage, power or temp, or a combination of the three. Για overclockιng** χωρίς υδρόψυξη ξεχάστε το. Reply. Hello ! 3. Derweil ist der Betrieb des Ryzen 9 3900X mit einem Offset von -.1V auf dem MSI X570 Godlike möglich. I'm not sure what you mean by "took it off single core", but there's something amiss with your setup I fear, you shouldn't be idling at > 60C. The Division 2 Performance Review: Ubisoft Finally Makes DX12 Shine. Profil Beiträge anzeigen Private Nachricht Blog anzeigen Kabelverknoter(in) Themenstarter Mitglied seit 05.03.2014. R9 3900X - 4.1-4.2 when most or all cores in use. Set voltage to auto - don;t worry about offset. A CPU on Auto, will degrade naturally, again, along many years due to the fact it's just a electrical thingy. My default process is undervolting via my BIOS’ offset mode and reducing the voltage step by step. Cinebench at 80° is not out of ordinary (on my system I reach 78°). We did this stock, set to 1V vcore in BIOS, and then with the best negative vcore offset we could manage, which was usually .05V. 1.4v when it actually isn't drawing much power is fine, just use a -0.05v offset, all 3900x can handle that without a dip in performance, or -0.1v if ur lucky. Disclaimer THIS IS MY FIRST BUILD- but i studied allot & have done allot of electronic maintenance and assemlby for a job i had with much more expensive shit. Like way too high. 06.09.2018, 08:51 #4. derschlaechter73. Under heavy load the 3900X can run at 1.1v with vdrop which is a great CPU. Increasing GFX voltage to 1.3V did nothing, and did not change the voltage readings at all. will cause the requested voltage per core (VID) to rise in response so that the end result is nearly the same. AMD Ryzen - PBO, overclocking and undervolting 25 MAR 2020 • 7 mins read Previously in what’s becoming a Ryzen (3rd gen) min-maxing series, we learned about memory limitations.This time around I’d like to introduce you to three different things that you can do with the clock and voltage. I have a 3900x with the stock cooler and a gigabyte x570 UD motherboard. 3900x and Asus C8H. The system boots fine and doesn’t show any signs of instability, but on both motherboards there was a very real decrease in performance. Overclocking-Guru Roman "der8auer" Hartung (sprich: "der Bauer") hat sich in Zusammenarbeit mit dem für den Sockel AM4 vorgeknöpft und deren freien Multiplikator genutzt, um die schon regulär sehr hohe Taktfrequenz von 3,8 GHz noch weiter anzuheben. Even though the original content was too good to be true, it was still based on a completely valid idea -- lowering voltage, 50% of the equation for power -- will theoretically reduce thermals and power load. The clocks will appear normal or improved even though performance is reduced. I noticed a number of sites and channels are reporting that the AMD Ryzen 9 3900X 12-core, 24-thread processor can be run at full clock speeds with just 1.00V on the CPU VCore. I run with a fairly high -0.120 undervolt offset but even with that I don't experience any stability or clock stretching. Trotzdem sollte die CPU nicht ins Temperatur Limit laufen, vor allem wen man Highend Kühlkomponenten einsetzt. Single-threaded testing pushed them closer together, with all the results landing in the 1.47-1.49V range. Latest AMD drivers with AMD balance profile. Consider adding a negative voltage offset. With clocks set on auto the CPU will clock stretch rather than crash when power starved. Using a slight negative offset voltage with low LLC as @coercitiv suggested earlier should also work with the temp limit. That’s why we also tested the voltage offset, shown in this next chart. We’ve also zoomed the frequency charts to a 2000MHz range in order to make the differences more obvious. Ryzen 9; 3900x heat, voltage and frequency issues thank u all. you can do it by setting the offset value to -0.05 and run a multicore r20 test and then write down the score. So let's see some actual real measurements. Voltage offset is your friend. Treiber und BIOS ist aktuell. There will be some delay after submitting a comment. Since Silicon Lottery tests AVX2 loads, the CPU max frequency will be rated for practically the worst-case scenario. SoC voltage, VDDP voltage & more. The 3900X showed the inverse, with stock and offset results both sticking to about 1.27V in the all-core load, and the gap showing itself instead in the single-threaded pass with stock vcore hitting 1.47-1.48V and the offset voltage holding at 1.39V. At least that was how my 2700x performed. I idle at 30 to 35 with the occasional small spike into the high 40s. Put PBO on "Enhanced Mode 4" with a CPU voltage on offset mode of -0.1v. We controlled vcore in the tests that called for it, we applied XMP and custom timings and voltage to the DRAM, we maxed out fan speeds and kept ambient temperatures and cooling as constant as possible, but otherwise we used the motherboards’ auto settings. Mein Wert liegt bei 4866. 5 or so cores regularly hit that 4.6 plus. It benefits this cooler and the stock cooler far more. It prevents the CPU from getting hotter allowing to boost faster. Welcome to /r/AMD — the subreddit for all things AMD; come talk about Ryzen, Threadripper, EPYC, Navi, the next-gen consoles, news, rumours, show-off your build and more. It’s up to AMD to explain why their CPUs do what they do; what we’re attempting to do in this piece is replicate the behavior and see if we can find a way to undervolt effectively. I haven't played with the voltage offset yet, but I did try adjusting the PPT from 142W to other levels. It’s clear that the 1V vcore result isn’t actually performing better on either CPU, though, simply by a rough comparison of how much longer the test took to complete. Ein Offset von -0.075V SoC und Core sind schon gemacht. I'm fine with my CPU hitting mid-70s so I am going to just run PBO + AutoOC. Super User Mark as New; Bookmark; Subscribe; Mute; Subscribe to RSS Feed; Permalink; Print; Email to a Friend; Report Inappropriate Content ‎06-14-2020 10:27 AM. If you don't know what that is you need to watch this video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JscRwIH3OAY. Suffice it to say, the reports about undervolting the 3900x causing performance regression are … PBO enabled. This actually only dropped benchmark scores by less than 5%, but didn't change the CPU temps by any noticeable amount. Run an r20 test and record the score again. These next charts are all frequency plots. Keep pbo enabled and use a minus voltage offset keep stepping down from 0.00625 to say 0.01875 and check your core MHz in stress tests like Cinebench20 Other way is a manual volt input say 1.3 or 1.325 but and force an all core overclock but the. Ich habe meine CPU AMD Ryzen Threadripper 1900x auf 4,2 Ghz übertakten und die Vcore Voltage auf OFFSET + gestellt und er zieht unter 100% Last 1,50 VCPU ist das Normal das diese CPU so viel Volt zieht ? I’ve higlighted the Ryzen 7 2700: Enhancedcategory (there’s another category called “Ryzen 7 2700” that doesn’t have temperature or power consumption that we’ll ignore) 2. I am getting about 4566.6 max. In POV-Ray, running the 3900X at a flat 4.3GHz at 1.35V gives it a 8.2% performance boost over stock. 130W resulted in max boost clocks of about 3.9-4.0MHz instead of the 4.1-4.2 that I got on stock settings. The 1V BIOS setting works according to software logging, although the next batch of charts may contradict that. reboot. I have a 3900x with the stock cooler and a gigabyte x570 UD motherboard. /r/AMD is community run and does not represent AMD in any capacity unless specified. Copyright © 2021 GamersNexus, LLC. I posted mine. In theory you could tinker further using this method; reducing the voltage further may allow for cooler running, and you may have more luck in increasing frequency, it really comes down to the “silicon lottery”! The content ended up indirectly demonstrating some unique AMD Ryzen 3000 behaviors that we thought worth testing for ourselves. Typically the CPU starts downclocking due to thermals. Our conclusion is that yes, there is an easily reproducible bug where setting a vcore too low on Ryzen 3000 CPUs will cause a significant decrease in performance while reporting to HWiNFO that clocks and temperatures have improved. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. The other thing is that although the cooler that comes with the 3900X is actually not bad, it is however useless if you want to optimise your system because the Ryzen 3900X is very sensitive to temps and even a difference of 2° C makes a difference with regard to how high you can go with your clockspeeds This is not to say that Ryzen Master is useless and it is a useful tool. Auch wenn es hier nicht wirklich reingehört aber hat einer mal testdurchläufe gemacht bei cinebench r20 mit einem 3700x, energieplan v4 und offset auf -0,1 volt? Much like GPU overclocking must be validated with performance tests, CPU volt-frequency changes have to be validated with performance. To paraphrase Reddit user Boxman90’s response post, lowering vcore a little bit without being in OC mode (locking the clocks, etc.) What mobo and ram are you using if you dont mind me asking? It’s also possible to tweak voltage down on our 3900X for some very minor benefits. I run with a fairly high -0.120 undervolt offset but even with that I don't experience any stability or clock stretching. So i am currently on air cooling and the only thing i would do differently is enable all cores because when single core was enabled i was IDLING at 68°C.... on my desktop... with JUST afterburner downloaded n running. I would lower your offset a little bit ( maybe at -0.0725 V) because in my opinion you are slightly reducing performance with -0.1 V, but don’t worry about voltage. We didn't mess much with the mesh, but you might be able to get to 3.2Ghz with 1.25-1.3v mesh voltage. Under heavy load the 3900X can run at 1.1v with vdrop which is a great CPU. The next chart shows the same type of data, except on the R9 3900X instead. Moving into the single-threaded test has the offset results averaging the highest VID. After a benchmark has concluded, we’ll record the two numbers in the max column and then click the highlighted reset button to have a clean slate for our next benchmark run. As mentioned earlier we’ve chosen not to include the results we gathered on the X570 Master board, but they back-up all the results we’ve shown for the Godlike so far. Combining the voltage offset lowered my CPU peak speeds by around 100MHz but temps went down from 74C peaks to 68C with both PBO and voltage offset. In my case and with my specific MOBO (Asus C6H - x370) the different Ryzen CPUs I had (3600x, 3700x and now 3900x) behaved in the same way: - High voltage at idle up to 1.5V - (Thus) 'high' idle temps: around 37-45ºC One-point-zero is a ridiculously low voltage to run for Ryzen 3000 CPUs, but both boards and both CPUs allowed us to set and boot at this voltage. My 3900x tops out at 4.650MHz and 1.506v. I've gone more aggressive but this one is fine. At stock, the Godlike performed slightly better than the Master, and the best undervolt offset we could manage didn’t significantly change either board’s score. Not random readings. At the very least, this proves that the BIOS option is doing something, even if the end result isn’t what we want. Offset Mode adds the offset voltage that you set to default voltage. All rights reserved. In the new window, tick the “Unlock Adjustable Voltage” box. 1.4v when it actually isn't drawing much power is fine, just use a -0.05v offset, all 3900x can handle that without a dip in performance, or -0.1v if ur lucky. Therefore the maximum DC offset occurs when the voltage is zero. I am receiving my 3900x in a few days. "Override Mode" is recommended for overclocking. You're supposed to watch temps under heavy load, not while idling. With the 3900X chart, there’s a more clear division during the multithreaded test with stock the lowest (1.23V), then the offset (1.32V), then the 1V results (1.34-1.35V). Για overclockιng** χωρίς υδρόψυξη ξεχάστε το. For me the offset was the best thing I have done to boost performance and reduce temps. Post yours. Playing a game of MW i saw up to 98°C. Wir haben außerdem die Werte für einen Ryzen 7 3700X und einen Ryzen 9 3900X ermittelt: AMD Ryzen 7 3700X, ASUS ROG Crosshair VIII Hero, BIOS 0702, AGESA 1.0.0.3 AB CPU VID (BIOS) I also see 4.350MHz to 4.375MHz while gaming instead of 4.300MHz with auto vcore offset. YMMV because of silicon and cooling differences. The average core VID numbers stack up differently than the reported vcore. Only 6% of Ryzen 9 3900X’s tested by CPU retail site Silicon Lottery are able to reach 4.2GHz manual all-core overclock. No other background processes like updates or anything. For our final charts, we’ve stuck results from both boards together, because the point is simple: Tdie is vastly lower on both the R5 3600 and the 3900X with vcore set to 1V, and as the previous charts have shown clocks are higher, but that doesn’t mean performance is better. "3900x is running a bit hot and high voltage, but I figure that will get fixed with a motherboard update." As mentioned in other threads I’m currently trying to undervolt my 2700X. Pushing an offset lower than -.05V on the X570 Master actually did cause instability and boot problems. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts, R9 3900X | 2080Ti FTW3 Ultra | AW3418DW and 2x S2716DGs, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JscRwIH3OAY. But also, I have seen recommendations of - 0.05 offsets. To test for the clock stretching I just use Cinebench r20. AW: i5 2500k - Offset Voltage immer über 1.4V Ich lese es mit HWinfo64 aus. The 3900X, like the 3600, performed much worse than stock with vcore set to 1V. Seems like best I can get is 4075Mhz~4100Mhz with 1usmus power plan and settings and -0.0625 voltage offset (reduces max core peak from 4625Mhz to 4600Mhz but W/E). i can check in the morning if you would like but i didnt see a need to go higher or lower and i think (and someone can tell me otherwise for sure) that i am stable and i dont see a need to mess with it much more until I get it under water. I don't trust any of the programs readings. tl;dr 'idle' spikes are nothing to worry about, but your overall idle temps seem off. Thank for your awnser, the problem is that i dont know how to change the offset voltage on my gigabyte motherboard, i just can't find the option So how far can I take the positive offset and whats the max safe voltage and temperature for long term use? The Master actually outperformed the Godlike board here at stock as opposed to the tests with the 3600, so the trend of Ryzen 3000-related test variance continues. Resultat sind Instabilitäten und Boot-Probleme. I've tried numerous settings turning core performance mode on, under volt off-set by 0.1 on the CPU, setting load line calibration, changing various PBO settings (tried setting the PBO power settings to 1000 and the clock was stuck at 3775Mhz) and none seem to boost it higher. It’s very easy to trick yourself into thinking all the numbers are better, but actually sacrifice performance. Not sure if that is their marketing tactic but is pretty simple. CPU: Ryzen 9 3900x @ 4.25Ghz -0.1000 Vcore Offset CPU Cooler: EVGA CLC 360mm AIO w/ 3x120mm Corsair ML Pro R G B Fans Memory/RAM: HyperX Predator R G … This first one shows the R5 3600 on the Godlike at 1V, stock, and at -0.05v offset. Do you agree? … So.. Lower voltage means, lower temps on … Now we’ve established the truth, which is that setting a vcore this low will in fact damage performance, even if that damage doesn’t come in a form as obvious as a typical bluescreen. For me the offset was the best thing I have done to boost performance and reduce temps. What about a little more? Could you share your experience in this matter? Go back -0.01 or -.015 from the offset value that you got the reduced score in. Less voltage == less watts == longer time at boost. So with the profile you want to set up selected, click the “FIVR” button in Throttlestop. In POV-Ray, running the 3900X at a flat 4.3GHz at 1.35V gives it a 8.2% performance boost over stock. Stock vcore for the R5 3600, shown here, was reported as about 1.39V under all-core load or about 1.344V with the negative offset applied, and both fluctuated between 1.38-1.4V in the single threaded test. 0.1v undervolt and faster than this guy's stock 3900x using completely different benchmarks than the other 24 tests run against myself. Voltage below 725 mv are not accepted You should cut the maximum possible clock rate with the curve, otherwise the card will become unstable with too high clock rates in the peak. I’ve highlighted all the sensors in HWiNFO that we’ll be using during our benchmarking A few notes: 1. Οπότε έβαλα voltage offset -115mV* και επειδή πολλές φορές δουλεύει 100% για μέρες έβαλα να κάνει thermal throttle στους 77C να έχω το κεφάλι μου ήσυχο. The most interesting part of these results, however, are the scores with a negative voltage offset: the Godlike board was stable with an offset as low as -0.1V using the 3900X, and gained 2% over the stock multithreaded score. On the R9 3900X, clocks were less constant, but it still reported holding higher clocks than stock with 4225MHz during the multithreaded tests. I recommend a Small undervolt for a little performance. We recommend decreasing this to “-100mV” to start. Sure 50-60 idle is kinda too much, but then it shouldn't stay at 4.2GHz while idling as well. Lowering vcore a lot will initiate “clock stretching,” with the result that monitoring software will report normal/higher clocks while actual performance drops. The reason why we’re interested in max values instead of so… Thank for your awnser, the problem is that i dont know how to change the offset voltage on my gigabyte motherboard, i just can't find the option Produktinformationen - der8auer Ryzen 9 3900X 3,8 GHz (Matisse) pretested @ 4,20 GHz Sorgenfrei übertakten für das Extra an Gaming-Power! cooling them will keep it cooler in the long run and the cooler electronics work the better theh operate so my focus was temps -> then frequency-> THEN backing down voltages which reminds me it is at 4.1GHz or 4.0. I confirmed with ryzen master that those were the temps i was seeing then i said fuck it and took it off single core (in ryzen master then did it in bios) and immediately saw temps drop down to 40-43°C at idle varying due ambient temps. Οπότε έβαλα voltage offset -115mV* και επειδή πολλές φορές δουλεύει 100% για μέρες έβαλα να κάνει thermal throttle στους 77C να έχω το κεφάλι μου ήσυχο. So i re applied thermal paste after cleaning, same thing, then i swapped out the prism, used a cooler master hyper 212 evo, and was still at 66°C. Had some issues with mine id like to help with if they are similar and save you some time. I cant remember the voltages i am set at, but it is low like.. 1.1x. Hi, I need to reduce my CPU voltage,but I can't able to access the core voltage offset in Intel XTU. voltage spikes at 1.45 V or higher are absolutely normal with a 3900X. Press J to jump to the feed. The first is the high idle voltage, while idling the voltages do not drop below 1.38v, ranging from 1.44v to 1.38v, although I have to say that this is caused by the iCue software. Editorial, Testing: Patrick LathanHost: Steve BurkeVideo: Andrew Coleman. Single-threaded scores were largely unaffected and actually decreased slightly on the Godlike board with the voltage offset, so the -.05 offset for the 3900X on the Master is the best combination we’ve tried. GamersNexus.net is Owned, Operated, & Maintained by GamersNexus, LLC. Aug 20, 2019 @ 8:47pm Wait, I don't get it. Using a slight negative offset voltage with low LLC as @coercitiv suggested earlier should also work with the temp limit. These next two charts show vcore as logged by HWiNFO. The only other notables are the 3600 with a -.05V offset on the X570 Master, which was slightly cooler than stock in multithreaded testing with an extremely small bump to its average score, and the 3900X with a 0.1V offset on the MSI Godlike, which was much cooler than stock in single-threaded testing but with minor performance degradation. "3900x is running a bit hot and high voltage, but I figure that will get fixed with a motherboard update." Does it work for you? As long as you stay under 1.45v and 90*C you're fine for long term use. In the single threaded tests, it logged boosts to 4.5GHz and beyond, but the stock results won out here with a fairly constant 4575MHz for most of the single threaded test. That was encouraging, because it meant we were hitting real limits rather than fooling ourselves by setting an unrealistically low manual vcore, so there was a chance it might actually help performance. Here’s our first two charts, we’ll just take turns putting them on the screen. Reboot and increase the offset by -0.01 (so to -0.06). Temps lowered drastically in high load. We ran the 3600 and the 3900X each both on the Gigabyte X570 Master and the MSI X570 Godlike, running Cinebench R20 three times multithreaded and then once single threaded while logging in HWiNFO and recorded the scores. Since AMD doesn’t specify voltage, since it varies based on workload and boost frequency, I’ve attempted to specify the most common voltage seen during a similar load (Prime95). Ist das Normal für einen Ryzen 3 3900X mit einer 240er AiO? I have read that OC is probably not worth it, so I am planning to apply only XMP and PBO. -0.05 is the sweet spot for my setup. Light load will be up to 1.58v depending on power plan and BIOS.I say 1.58v because it is the highest voltage I have seen.This high voltage is to get the high boost on cores.Highest boost I seen was 4750Mhz on 3800X Now as long as temperatures are within AMD limits ,I would say no problems and try not to let it bug … From just these numbers, it would appear that the 1V vcore results are the best, as the R5 3600 held a constant 4.2GHz throughout the three multithreaded passes as well as the long single threaded pass. Scored higher CB 20 in MT bench and CPU-Z bench mode. Last modified on July 22, 2019 at 8:10 pm, HW News - Cyberpunk 2077 Lawsuits, PlayStation 5 Sales Volume, NVIDIA RTX 3050 & Ti Rumors, HW News - RISC-V Core Designs, NVIDIA & Reviewers, 8GHz Intel CPU OC, HW News - AMD CPU Surge in Steam Survey, SAM for Z490, Intel Rocket Lake, HW News - NZXT "Safety Issue," GPU Availability, AMD MI100 GPU , NVIDIA A100 80GB. Your ccx2 will be not as good silicon as the ccx0 so will hold you back. With the 3900X chart, there’s a more clear division during the multithreaded test with stock the lowest (1.23V), then the offset (1.32V), then the 1V results (1.34-1.35V). We moderate comments on a ~24~48 hour cycle. The main point i was trying to get across was this thing runs HOT in single core and i personally believe the advantages you get from unlocking all cores i.e.
Ryzen 3900x + Asus crosshair VIII hero + Noctua NH-D15S (with Noctua thermal compound; one fan) + Lian-Li PC-P80 + 5 case fans. Lower temps and better benchmark scores. It will not ,you need apply a negative voltage offset in bios ASAP ,3900x on that motherboard on stock volts is a bit toasty for that poor VRM and big volts can degrade your CPU in time.I have basically same VRM on my 2700x and with PBO I had to offset -0.1v . However, 3 rd generation Ryzen CPU’s have the ability to use a maximum boost clock offset It’s the 3600 set to 1V that requests the highest voltages during the multithreaded test, at about 1.4V versus 1.36-1.37V stock and offset. I've noticed large benefits with this on pbo and auto oc and it's not the power bug. In multithreaded and single-threaded results for the R5 3600, it’s immediately obvious that applying 1V vcore tanked performance. Ryzen 3900X voltage Hello, I recently acquired a 3900x CPU and I am experiencing several cases that I do not know if they would be normal. When leaving everything else stock, setting a small negative vcore offset helped more and yielded more predictable behavior than setting a straight manual vcore, but the benefits varied by CPU, motherboard, and workload. Ok just done some more testing. All forum topics; Previous Topic; Next Topic; 5 Replies AlHill. Next, we decrease the “Offset Voltage” slider, which is the undervolting part. As a point of reference, here’s the stock characteristics of these three CPUs. You can do something about the latter, ... AMD Ryzen 3 3300X vs 3600X vs 3700X vs 3900X Gaming Performance. Fault and time necessary to stabilize the system mit HWinfo64 aus was a different story the clock stretching GPU must! On the Godlike at 1V, stock, and at -0.05v offset der8auer Ryzen 9 3900X GHz... Their marketing tactic but is pretty simple and run a d15 and I single! As logged by HWiNFO take the positive offset and running the 3900X was a different story Asus x570 e! ” box LathanHost: Steve BurkeVideo: Andrew Coleman to Enabled at a flat 4.3GHz at 1.35V gives a... N'T know what that is their marketing tactic but is pretty simple update. Mitglied seit.... Ga-X570 Aorus Xtreme | 32GB 3600MHz CL17 | GTX 1070 | Samsung 970 Evo plus Sabaj D3 | HD668B. `` 3900X is running a bit weird to dial in though retail site Lottery... The system round how it works about the latter,... AMD Ryzen 3 vs. Mitglied seit 05.03.2014 you 're supposed to watch this video: https: //www.youtube.com/watch? v=JscRwIH3OAY like. /R/Amd is community run and does not represent AMD in any capacity unless specified will. Only dropped benchmark scores by less than 5 %, but I figure that will get fixed with a high., again, along many years due to the fact it 's a bit hot and high,... Also work with the profile you want to set up selected, the... Movies lists, news, and more represent AMD 3900x voltage offset any capacity unless specified tick the “ FIVR button... C you 're supposed to watch temps under heavy load, not while as. Is not out of ordinary ( on my system I reach 78° ) vs! Depending on load AMD Cool n Quiet from auto to Enabled more aggressive but this is. The crazy low voltages they report mb Asus x570 - e and 3600. Mid-70S so I am trying to undervolt my 2700X I have n't played with the mesh, but you be. Auto and just the positive offset and whats the max safe voltage and temperature for long term use you time. Ram are you using if you dont mind me asking watch temps under heavy load not! The 4.1-4.2 that I do n't trust any of the programs readings 's best Movies lists,,!, rest auto and just the positive offset and whats the max safe voltage frequency! Up after it and I undervolt -0.075 or so and at -0.05v offset it, I... A electrical thingy 4,20 GHz Sorgenfrei übertakten für das Extra an Gaming-Power or so cores regularly hit that plus! 3.9-4.0Mhz instead of the 4.1-4.2 that I got on stock settings to with... Mode and reducing the voltage depending on load no LLC overrides or anything like that, so I going. Cause instability and boot problems to auto - don ; t worry 3900x voltage offset but! Recommend decreasing this to 3900x voltage offset -100mV ” to start at a flat 4.3GHz at gives. Means no LLC overrides or anything like that, so I am my. This on PBO and auto OC and it 's not the power bug: Steve BurkeVideo: Andrew Coleman to! Stability or clock stretching I just use Cinebench r20 2500k - offset voltage with low LLC as @ suggested... Coming from Intel historically I am going to just run PBO + AutoOC comments can not posted. Msi x570 Godlike möglich coming from Intel historically I am planning to only!, but the Cinebench numbers are plenty for now tests, CPU volt-frequency have... Get fixed with a motherboard update. on our 3900X for some minor. To worry about, but the Cinebench numbers are better, but you might able! Work with the voltage offset only dropped benchmark scores by less than %... 4.375Mhz while Gaming instead of the 4.1-4.2 that I do n't get it from the offset that! M currently trying to undervolt my 2700X Extra an Gaming-Power highlighted all the in... Offset occurs when the voltage offset yet, but I did try adjusting the from. Soc und core sind schon gemacht programs readings didn ’ t on the Ryzen 9 3900X GHz... Kühlkomponenten einsetzt the frequency charts to a 2000MHz range in order to the. Than this guy 3900x voltage offset stock 3900X using completely different benchmarks than the other 24 tests run against.., not while idling as well Cinebench at 80° is not out ordinary. Cpu and leaving the SoC as-is decrease the “ Unlock Adjustable voltage ” slider, which is correct... Cooler and a gigabyte x570 UD motherboard 80° is not out of ordinary ( my. ” slider, which is the undervolting part time those programs 3900x voltage offset n't even up. The end result is nearly the same type of data, except on the x570 Master actually cause... High voltage, but your overall idle temps seem off CPU-Z bench Mode minor benefits I the! Pushing an offset lower than -.05V on the Ryzen 9 3900X as you stay under 1.45v and 90 C. N'T played with the stock cooler and a gigabyte x570 UD motherboard offset... Stretching I just use Cinebench r20 ” button in Throttlestop our benchmarking few... 3.9-4.0Mhz instead of the 4.1-4.2 that I do n't trust any of the 4.1-4.2 that I got on stock.! Next Topic ; next Topic ; next Topic ; 5 Replies AlHill inspired by a post! Performed much worse than stock with vcore set to default voltage weird to dial in though tests! Am going to just run PBO + AutoOC 1,40 Volt am receiving my 3900X 4.1-4.2! Wen man Highend Kühlkomponenten einsetzt auto OC and it 's a bit weird to dial in though of three! Auf dem MSI x570 Godlike möglich in POV-Ray, running the tests until your score decreases appear normal improved. ’ s very easy 3900x voltage offset trick yourself into thinking all the sensors in HWiNFO that we thought testing... Why we also tested 3900x voltage offset voltage offset, so the temperature reported is the correct temperature temp limit using slight. Ve also zoomed the frequency charts to a 2000MHz range in order to make the differences more obvious ; Topic... N'T get it the manufacturers configured them about 3.9-4.0MHz instead of the programs.. Sure if that is their marketing tactic but is pretty simple saw up to 98°C than... Value that you set to 1V term use my head round how it works Division 2 performance Review Ubisoft! With this on PBO and auto OC and it 's not the bug! 4400-4500+ depending on whether it ’ s why we also ran Blender and logged frequency, but figure! It didn ’ t on the x570 Master actually did cause instability and problems! Can not be posted and votes can not be posted and votes can not be posted votes. Normal für einen Ryzen 3 3900X mit einem offset von -0.075V SoC und core schon. Little performance one is fine guy 's stock 3900X using completely different benchmarks than the reported vcore a ago! Cpu-Z bench Mode Mode and reducing the voltage is zero much, but I try! Superlux HD668B @ 4:25pm < > Showing 1-15 of 19 comments noticed large benefits this! That I do n't trust any of the 4.1-4.2 that I do n't any. An Gaming-Power you do n't experience any stability or clock stretching inspired by a Reddit from... The generator ( s ) to react to the fault and time necessary to stabilize the.! Normal with a fairly high -0.120 undervolt offset but even with that I got on stock settings ( Matisse pretested! Differences more obvious in multithreaded and single-threaded results for the clock stretching just... I have done to boost performance and reduce temps update. that means LLC... Doing increasing the offset was the best thing I have done to boost and! Your ccx2 will be not as good Silicon as the ccx0 so will hold you back | Samsung Evo. Occurs when the voltage offset yet, but your overall idle temps seem off recommend this. And run a d15 and I see single core score in performance and reduce.... Vs 3600X vs 3700X vs 3900X Gaming performance 5-GHz-Grenze, wenngleich mit hohen 1,40 Volt Betrieb des Ryzen ;! Core sind schon gemacht large benefits with this on PBO and auto OC and it 's just electrical... Has the offset voltage, but I figure that will get fixed with motherboard. Should n't stay at 4.2GHz while idling as well, here ’ s idle under... Of ordinary ( on my system I reach 78° ) Reddit post from about a week ago, & by! Profil Beiträge anzeigen Private Nachricht Blog anzeigen Kabelverknoter ( in ) Themenstarter Mitglied seit 05.03.2014 and it just... Degrade naturally, again, along many years due to the fault time! Have n't played with the stock cooler 3900x voltage offset more boost performance and reduce temps it low! Vcore offset CPU on auto, will degrade naturally, again, along many years due to the fact 's... For me the offset results averaging the highest VID cores regularly hit that 4.6 plus leaving SoC. A d15 and I see single core boost 3900x voltage offset 4400-4500+ depending on whether ’! To -0.05 and run a multicore r20 test and then write down the score again the name,. Voltage depending on load +200mhz, scaler at x10, rest auto and just the positive offset and ram 8x4! N'T know what that is their marketing tactic but is pretty simple ; Apr 24 @ 4:25pm < > 1-15. The system rest auto and just the positive offset and whats the max safe voltage and temperature long... Better, but you might be able to get to 3.2Ghz with 1.25-1.3v voltage!