Regardless of all I said just above, the fact remains that the gamut of the luster papers still considerably exceeds that of the matte papers. Luminous Landscape will use the information you provide on this form to be in touch with you and to provide updates and marketing. You can order your Canon … To very briefly summarize my findings on (1) determined on the basis of creating L*a*b* variances from patch values of a GMCC, which I may write-up one of these days, generally a side-by-side comparison of divergent L* values would show-up a difference as little as 1 level and a more pronounced difference from 2 levels onward. I found no evidence of bronzing in all the printing I’ve done with this class of printers. Each different kind of media requires its own kind of image editing. Suffice to remind here that “accuracy” in this context means how closely [in dE(76) terms] the Lab values of measured colour patches on the GMCC testing target printed with the relevant profile cohere with the image file Lab values for those patches. The imagePROGRAF PRO-200 can … Figure 6 shows the new print head compared with the model for previous large format models. If done well, a unique printing process can convey an added layer of meaning to a photograph. Review of Canon PRO-2000. The Multifunction Roll unit will intelligently send a print job to the correct media. Canon Pro-4000 & Pro-2000 This is a review of the Canon … Monochrome images displayed excellent tonality and contrast. all such programs, … Therefore, they needed and developed new methods – in particular a mathematical model deriving from the physics of light reflectance that would highly correlate the results of measurements (of L* and optical density) with those of subjective evaluation. Canon Pro-4000 & Pro-2000 Review Keith Cooper from Northlight Images provided his usual thorough, technical, in-depth review of the 44″ Pro 4000. Photography and Camera News, Reviews, and Inspiration. One is Canon’s new imagePROGRAF PRO-1000 printer, a 17x22-inch sheetfed printer that is the subject of this field test review. This is the kind of photo that could come out muddy looking on a matte paper, but between careful LR editing under soft-proof and the quality of the printer/paper combination, it doesn’t. The 24"-wide model with an 11-Color plus Chroma Optimizer ink system that embraces every challenge obsessed photographers and designers can throw at it. The Canon faithful should be extremely pleased based on what I've seen so far. I emphasize at this point that is very often the case that custom profiles will deliver more accurate results than supplier profiles for well known reasons (e.g. Our co-tester said the printer did a beautiful job reproducing high-res files from a pair of medium-format cameras. different machines of the same model, different printing environment). The width is only wider than the carriage by the amount needed for the transport mechanism. (That said, the thing will still visibly shake as it prints.) The 24" imagePROGRAF PRO-2000 printer is designed to exceed expectations for image quality and color consistency in a large format printer. At that point, a single person can do the rest of the setup, which isn’t overly complicated. Want more PDN? For example, an average could consist of 24 different dE values all quite close to the average, i.e. Introduced as the flagship model in the … Canon is not alone in charging an arm and a leg for ink so it seems a bit churlish to point out that to refill all 11 inks on the PRO-2000 would cost you half as much as the printer itself. I did not use the B&W mode in the printer driver or PSP, because in general I like to retain full control and predictability over the tonality of my B&W prints (i.e. All very acceptable. The width is only wider than the carriage by the amount needed for the transport mechanism. The printer’s ability to handle two rolls of different paper sequentially (Figure 3) without the user needing to recharge the rollers each time provides a real efficiency boost when working back and forth between a pair of papers, as we did quite often during the testing work. The results of this exercise were excellent: an average dE(76) of 0.75 – one of my best (Figure 12). If I examine such prints at optimal viewing angles for seeing image detail, vibrancy and dynamic range, this gloss differential is not apparent; this probably because, for optimal viewing, the correct placement of the print relative to the primary lighting source and the observer would minimize surface glare and texture. The footprint of this machine considering the 24-inch carriage width is the smallest that’s been designed for this size carriage that I’ve seen. The purpose of printing these two photos is to see how well the matte paper and printer could reproduce photos that depend on clean, high contrast impact (neutral or toned) to make the intended impression. You can access printer settings via a 3.5-inch color touch screen, and the PRO-2000 supports printing over a wireless network or directly from USB devices. This was made possible because the ink tanks are positioned top-back rather than on the sides. PROS: Beautiful image quality; print cost calculator software; built-in hard drive; ink tanks are hot-swappable; media is easy to load and calibrate. So we use good profiles, whether OEM or custom, in order to make good prints with as little waste as possible, and it is here where the Canon Pro series printers really shine. Contact Us | The best large-format printers Canon … I provided this rather extensive (but not exhaustive) discussion of profiling because questions have arisen about how best to profile these printers, and I encountered difficulties and found solutions that I considered worthwhile sharing with the community. With support for pages … The depth is shallow enough to wheel the printer through a standard North American doorway (Figure 5). Likewise, for the Canon Pro-1000, I obtained results of 1.02, 0.93 and 1.02 for FAS, FABW and FAPR respectively. This was made possible because the ink tanks are positioned top-back rather than on the sides. Canon’s Print Studio Pro software acts as a Photoshop automation. Click here to sign up for our email newsletter and get the week’s top stories delivered straight to you. I say this because the printer has already been well-reviewed (Keith Cooper, NorthLight Images, and Scott Martin, Onsight). This in itself was telling – the answers were not so obvious as the prints appear so similar. One blind tasting was held at the new Canon printer lab in Brampton Ontario, which has a nice combination of very even daylight and overhead indoor lighting, and the others in my living room, which has large windows allowing in generous amounts of daylight. Filed Under: Columns, Reviews Tagged With: Canon P2000, member, member-only, P2000. I also tested printing the profiling targets in the Pro-2000 printer directly from i1Profiler, but the results from that exercise mildly exceeded my acceptable range. Now, when you consider that the L* values read from the Black (L*0) patch of the accuracy test page with the i1Pro2 spectrophotometer indicate L* 13.8/14 for FA Smooth and 2.9/3.6 for FA PolRag, it is clear that the value of Black assessed from subjective evaluation and that read with the spectrophotometer don’t correlate – in the sense that the matte Black (FASmooth) doesn’t look ten levels lighter than the luster (FAPolRag) Black as the L* values would suggest it should, making the point of the Canon scientists. This outcome is also very satisfying. All three papers (Premium FASmooth, FABrightWhite, FAPolRag) have cotton rag substrate and no OBAs. The use of new a 1.28-inch wide 12-channel integrated compact print head, LUCIA PRO ink set plus Chroma Optimizer, a high-precision mechanical platform and the L-COA PRO high-speed image processing engine achieves a balance between exceptional print … I put two questions to the observers: (1) which sample has the deepest, richest-looking Black (the background) and (2) which displays the most colour vibrancy (the vase of flowers)? One observer remarked that this is as much a reflection on the state of the technologies as a result of consistent, high quality profiling (so X-Rite and I will take the blame for the latter). That said, thanks to the built-in hard drive, you can move print files from your PC to the printer and free up your PC’s memory for other tasks. (2) Depending on the answer to (1), can I improve using Pro1000 custom profiles in the Pro2000 printer? It continues using the content of the sub-tank while the principal tank is replaced. Recognizing that good profiling begins with correctly printing the profiling targets, I began to wonder whether I was committing some very basic procedural error causing this seemingly endless odyssey of unsatisfactory profiling or profile accuracy measurement. The results were stunningly unsatisfactory (Figure 11). The intent of printing this photo was to see how well the printer/paper could handle crisp detail and very natural-looking colour saturation, in particular winter-blue sky and the maroon-red on the ship, as well as the tonal relationships between the white cranes and the background. canon u.s.a.,inc. Whereas the previous iPF6100, iPF6300 and iPF 6400 showed a steady evolution in design, the PRO series of printers looks distinctly different (links are to my reviews of previous models).The printer is bigger and heavier than previous models and has a much higher ink capacity – those two boxes at the rear hold 12 ink carts in sizes up to 700ml. Just as a reminder on profiling methodology for those interested, I’m using i1Profiler with an i1Pro 2, the X-Rite 2033 patch chart with scrambled patches, large tables option, V4 profile version, neutral contrast and saturation, default ambient light settings (Standard and D50), 16-bit granularity, smoothness 50, default White Point and M0, M1 and M2 measurement conditions. In the hands of people who know how to do good photo preparation for printing they produce superb results. The Luminance values for the FASmooth are higher than for the FAPolRag, but all the colour values are lower, accounting for the higher gamut volume of FAPolRag. However the specific ways in which the model was deployed for the development of the inkset are not explained – presumably that’s their “secret sauce”; but whatever they did really works well – our primary interest here, and illustrated below. So this little excursion demonstrated several important things: (1) the basic methodology remains OK, all else equal, (2) OSX isn’t playing games with me and (3) the paper I was using is amenable to good profiling. The user registers the media type for each roll in the printer LCD menu; thereafter when selecting that media type in the driver for printing, the printer knows from which roll to draw the paper. *Why* has never been clarified, this being a matter best left to the engineers in Adobe and Canon, but my basic objective was to see what works best empirically and then use it to print. fairly flat bar chart shape (less likely to be bothersome), or a much more peaky shape where some dE values diverge widely from the average with all the rest being quite close to the average (the outlying colours being more likely bothersome). A selection of prints produced on the imagePROGRAF PRO-2000. While on the subject of ink tanks, I especially appreciated that each tank has its own sub-tank filled with ink. This in itself was telling – the answers were not so obvious as the prints appear so similar. The Epson does offer a slightly larger colour gamut (8.9% larger gamut when printing on Semi-gloss photo paper at high quality) than the Canon … They had to look long and hard, moving around the photo layout to make sure they viewed the prints at the most revealing lighting angles they could. Mark has been making photographs for the past six decades and started adopting a digital workflow in 1999 first with scanning film, then going fully digital in 2004. Once a group of photos is opened and selected in PSP and the print settings chosen, one can click Print and move on to something else. Close examination of some comparison prints Canon Canada prepared from the IPF 6400 and the Pro-2000 indicates a somewhat cleaner looking, better-defined image from the Pro-2000. Related Articles: Why? I put two questions to the observers: (1) which sample has the deepest, richest-looking Black (the background) and (2) which displays the most colour vibrancy (the vase of flowers)? Obviously, the specific Pro-1000 in my studio is not equivalent to Canon’s new Pro-2000 – to an extent that exceeds the expected range of variation one would expect between two units of “the same” technology. The printer works with an optional Multifunction Roll System ($800). The result with Canon Pro Matte paper was 2.54. Very much as I had expected based on my observation, for the most part, the winning paper for Black appearance was FA Smooth (recall: matte) in the Pro1000/2000, and the winning paper for vibrancy was FA PolRag or IGFS in the Pro-1000(recall: luster-like). Well, yes and no. The Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-2000 is a wide-format inkjet printer. The Canon imagePrograf PRO-1000 ($1,299.99) is the first new near-dedicated photo printer we've seen from Canon in quite a while, and it was well worth the wait. This article is more about the related items of interest than about the printer itself, though they are intimately connected. ], One blind tasting was held at the new Canon printer lab in Brampton Ontario, which has a nice combination of very even daylight and overhead indoor lighting, and the others in my living room, which has large windows allowing in generous amounts of daylight. When the principal tank is empty, printing doesn’t stop. Therefore, they needed and developed new methods – in particular a mathematical model deriving from the physics of light reflectance that would highly correlate the results of measurements (of L* and optical density) with those of subjective evaluation. Having developed these equations relating L* and optical density to colour appearance, they no longer needed recourse to the spectroradiometer and the laborious construction of physical environments to replicate each viewing condition. The imagePROGRAF PRO-2000 can deliver professional prints with the 2400 x 600 dpi resolution. Cartridges cost $97, $173 and $294 to replace, respectively. Epson’s comparably priced SureColor P6000 offers a printer server drive as an option. All rights reserved. Because I did not create these profiles, my tasks were limited to printing my accuracy test target from Photoshop using the OEM profile and Absolute Rendering Intent and measuring the resulting print with i1Profiler and an i1Pro2 spectrophotometer (under M0, M1 and M2 conditions for handling OBAs), then importing the results into my Excel template for calculating the dE results. They had to look long and hard, moving around the photo layout to make sure they viewed the prints at the most revealing lighting angles they could. As I mentioned earlier, the other two are OEM papers being marketed by Canon but not designed by Canon. The 3-inch LCD display serves not only as a menu but a live guide and troubleshooter during set-up and operation. As well, Marcin Kaluza has written a number of insightful contributions on the new line of Canon printers responding to various topics in this website’s Forum. I then profiled FABW and FAPR in the Pro-2000, obtaining results of average dE(76) 1.03 and 0.84 respectively. Enter a new suite of papers to work with. See reviews, photos, directions, phone numbers and more for Canon Camera locations in Phoenix, AZ. Another very useful touch is the included Accounting Manager software. But this didn’t happen just by some Canon engineers tweaking the previous generation at the margins. The use of new a 1.28-inch wide 12-channel integrated compact … Hence I decided to switch the profile procedural testing from Canon Pro Luster to these new papers, but adhering to Canon’s advice re Media Types and to use PSP for printing the profiling targets. Setting up the printer will definitely require two adults, at least for the initial phase when the 223-pound unit is lifted from the packaging and placed on its stand. I initially thought this would be an easy article to write because I had already written a review of the Pro-1000 for this website and Canon said the print head and the inkset are the same for the whole new line of Pro-1000, Pro-2000 and Pro-4000 printers. FAS is a paper Canon designed and is manufactured in Switzerland; the other two are other brand owners’ papers being marketed by Canon specifically for their wide-format commercial customers (24 inch rolls and upward). PDN Subscribers get instant access to this site for FREE. The sheet sizes for North America are US Letter, 13*19 inch and 17*22 inch. The matte paper is appropriate to the gritty feel of the subject matter. As I profiled and printed with the three new papers in both the Pro-2000 and Pro-1000 printers, I made sure to print the Figure 14 test photo for purposes of comparing Black rendition and overall vibrancy between the three new papers (plus several others) and two printers. So when we have profiles with average dE for 24 colours exceeding 2.0 ~ 3.0 (recognizing of course that some colours are above and others below that average difference), the general appearance of the results in a print with millions of intermingled colours may still be acceptable to a great many viewers. By this time, Canon Canada had received their first sample packs of three new papers Canon was bringing to market: Premium Fine Art Smooth (hereafter FAS – a matte paper), Premium Fine Art Bright White (hereafter FABW – also a matte paper) and Premium Fine Art Polished Rag (hereafter FAPR – a luster-like PK paper). Now, when you consider that the L* values read from the Black (L*0) patch of the accuracy test page with the i1Pro2 spectrophotometer indicate L* 13.8/14 for FA Smooth and 2.9/3.6 for FA PolRag, it is clear that the value of Black assessed from subjective evaluation and that read with the spectrophotometer don’t correlate – in the sense that the matte Black (FASmooth) doesn’t look ten levels lighter than the luster (FAPolRag) Black as the L* values would suggest it should, making the point of the Canon scientists. Figures 26 and 27 are photos of a completely different genre – this is photography of graphic art (outdoor wall art in downtown Toronto), Figure 26 intending to portray strong, bright and saturated colour, Figure 27 a combination of strong saturated colour in the foreground and more subtle almost pastel hues in the background; these kind of photos can be challenging to pull off successfully on matte media. The latest in printing, papers and post storage on display during PHOTOPLUS in New York City this last October. Moving on to item (2), using Pro-1000 profiles in the Pro-2000: I merrily set-about creating a custom profile in my usual way – using the Adobe Color Print Utility (ACPU) to print the profiling targets (because colour management needs to be disabled and this utility is *supposed to do that* and always did in the past), then measuring them with my i1Pro 2 and making three profiles corresponding with M0, M1 and M2 conditions. I selected 10 “real world” photographs from my archives with which to test the quality of the FASmooth paper in this printer model line. Premium Fine Art Smooth and Fine Art Bright White are very similar. The new models use the one larger printhead rather than two smaller ones. This turned out to be more challenging than I expected because technical factors other than ink and print head upset the expectation of sameness across the board. I selected the illustrations below to see how particular properties would show in the prints. In addition to the reformulated ink and more precise print heads, the construction of the printers has also been improved to reduce vibrations that could affect print sharpness. The first step of course, is to address item (1), which I did. Figures 21 and 22 are from photographs I made in Easter Island several years ago with my Sony NEX 6. He has worked with a considerable range of s... [ Author’s Page and Articles ], I initially thought this would be an easy article to write because I had already written a review of the Pro-1000 for this website and Canon said the print head and the inkset are the same for the whole new line of. More », August 21, 2019 Regarding the profiling, I found the OEM profiles to be useful, custom profiling perhaps better for the super-critical and for this option, best to use Print Studio Pro for printing the targets. An Immersive Experience: How Renowned Photographers are Captivating Audiences with Prints. 14 Inkjet Printers & Papers, What Photographers Need to Know About UV Printing, November 15, 2019 All three models offer comparable print resolutions and media handling. I then profiled FABW and FAPR in the Pro-2000, obtaining results of average dE(76) 1.03 and 0.84 respectively. But just before I go there, a bit more on print appearance and the new papers. sub-illuminant, such as from walls of the viewing room). lighter) for FASmooth than for FAPolRag, as expected. The inks h… I showed these prints to several people whose print evaluation skills are good and they were enthusiastically received. Readers of my Pro-1000 review may recall that this worked reasonably well, achieving an average dE of 1.26 for the Pro-1000 printer and Canon Pro Luster paper. Relevant to our current topic, OEM profiles for these papers were not yet available at the time. Your purchase helps support this site. If you plan on monetizing your investment with print sales, the software can help you set margins and track your ROI. Figures 23 and 24 are from Goreme Turkey and Toronto respectively. I also found the large LCD panel with its distinct messaging and ease of use for accessing many of the printer’s functions a delight to work with. I participated in setting up the first Pro-2000 that Canon Canada received, in their printer lab, at the time located in Mississauga Ontario. The PRO-2000 supports three different ink tank sizes, a 160ml cartridge, plus 330ml and 700ml tanks. Hence, I undertook some diagnostics, going back to very familiar territory that worked well in the past – profiling my Epson P800 using ACPU and all the usual settings – but this time with Canon Pro Luster paper. To get the most from it, and it can … Much more about these papers further on. The printer looks to be of very robust construction, is straightforward and easy to use, paper feeds very reliable, no channel-sharing of Black inks, compact for a printer of its carriage width and most important of all – it makes splendid prints if the profiles are good, the paper quality is good and the photos are suitably edited. That said, Epson’s P6000 takes two fewer cartridges. Premium FASmooth is a Canon designed paper now in its commercial packaging and being offered in rolls and sheets. Well, sad to say, but no such good fortune repeating the same exercise with the Pro-2000. Find 33 listings related to Canon Camera in Phoenix on YP.com. PRICE: $2,995 The new printers contain an all-new ink formulation, which includes 11 colors plus a new Chroma … (3) If not, how best to create custom profiles for the Pro2000? In this article, I have chosen to focus on several key elements relating to overall usability and print quality. HP only offers one ink tank size for its Z9+, a 300ml ink tank that’s about $30 cheaper than those from Canon and Epson. CONS: Can’t return to image editing when Canon Print Studio software is open; ink costs can add up quickly. I just happen to be more comfortable – and perhaps it makes soft-proofing more reliable – using profiles that render image file values quite correctly. Canon Pro-2000 Review and Related Items of Interest This article is more about the related items of interest than about the printer itself, though they are intimately connected. white, grey, or black), the position of the observer and the relative strength of the lighting reflected from the print as between diffuse reflection from a primary light source, versus specular reflection from a secondary light source (i.e. This is a large format photo ink jet printer that supports up to 24" wide rolls. While the printer sits on rollers, we’d be reluctant to roll it around all that much. We asked Patiño whether he would buy the imagePROGRAF PRO-2000. So clearly other differences between the models, not the inkset and the printhead, were at play. As with most Canon printers, you must install the … Or put otherwise, due to certain limitations of spectrophotometers, a series of measured L*a*b* values versus the ordering of Black shades from dark to lighter reported by viewers’ subjective evaluation can be inconsistent depending on the characteristics of the observation environment – particularly the colour of the walls (e.g. Patiño says he likes the fact that the print head is self-installable, so when it taps out, it’s easy to replace yourself. The analogue answer to digital photo frames, the Reframe makes it easy to change the prints hanging on your wall. Readers of my Pro-1000 review may recall that this worked reasonably well, achieving an average dE of 1.26 for the Pro-1000 printer and Canon Pro Luster paper. It worked. The main reason for the difference is that in order to achieve faster but equivalent quality production from the Pro-2000, they needed to modify the manner in which the ink is laid on paper in the Pro-2000 and those changes created the need for specific Pro-2000 profiles. You input your paper type and the software will calculate how much you’ve spent to create a given print (factoring in paper and ink use). The printer will throw off a warning for individual ink cartridges as they run low, but even when the warning appears, you’ll still have enough reserve capacity in the tank to make a few more prints. Epson’s no better: their SureColor P6000 ink prices are nearly identical to Canon’s at similar capacities. For the a* channel, differences of hue become more evident from about 2 levels onward. OEM (Original Equipment Manufacturer) Canon inkjet cartridges are high quality original ink cartridges designed exclusively for your Canon imagePROGRAF PRO-2000 printer. I did not replicate these samples on the Polished Rag because I had previously printed them on Ilford Gold Fibre Silk and saw that given how well they worked with both the matte and GFS papers, they would be at least as good on Polished Rag. Do NOT follow this link or you will be banned from the site! You can purchase Canon printers from B&H Photo. I was thinking of buying PROGRAF iPF6400 but somehow could not … Then Canon Inc. used this model for evaluative purposes in reformulating and optimizing the potential gamut provided from their inkset, one important element of which was the decision to replace the Green ink with Chroma optimizer. The fact that I’m trying to squeeze the very best I can out of these printers with custom profiling doesn’t mean that decent OEM profiles can’t be used to many peoples’ entire satisfaction, and the range shown here is decent. By this time, Canon Canada had received their first sample packs of three new papers Canon was bringing to market: Premium Fine Art Smooth (hereafter FAS – a matte paper), Premium Fine Art Bright White (hereafter FABW – also a matte paper) and Premium Fine Art Polished Rag (hereafter FAPR – a luster-like PK paper). Speaking of high productivity, I found the combination of Print Studio Pro and roll paper very handy for commissioning an automated sequence of prints from different photos. One prints this test image of course without making any adjustments to it. I made the Goreme photo with my Canon 1Ds MkIII and the Toronto photo with my Phase One P40+. On print appearance, there has been some recent conversation in the LuLa Forum about gloss differential and bronzing with the Luster/Gloss classes of papers. In particular, between the new printers, the new inkset and the new papers (FAS, FABW, FAPR) they have come closer to bridging the perceptual gap between matte and PK papers than several seasoned print viewers and I had ever seen before. This would be of particular interest to those using the printer in a high volume production environment. It took us between four to 10 minutes per print, depending on the size. Therefore, I wouldn’t dismiss OEM profiles out of hand just because I can achieve greater accuracy using custom profiles made with professional grade equipment and software. Patiño says he couldn’t have been happier with the results. The HP Z9+ offers a 500GB hard drive, though it has a heftier sticker price. As I wrote in the review of my Canon PRO-10, that printer really made me want to print even larger format.